The Torah Code Experiment
We formulate a few different Torah code experiments.
The first one is centered around Iran going nuclear, which when discussed in Hebrew has a literal
translation of Iran Atomic. The possibilities explored in the experiment
are shown in the table below.
This is the table showing the combination of key words that can form the key word sets of our
first experiment. The key word phrases איראןאטומי
and אירןאטומי do not occur in the Torah as ELSs.
The search produced a cylinder size of 75. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 63.5/10,000.
This table spans from Leviticus 22:34 through Leviticus 22:18.
The search produced a cylinder size of 75. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 66/10,000.
This table spans from Leviticus 22:34 through Leviticus 22:22.
The search produced a cylinder size of 49. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 194/10,000.
This table spans from Deuteronomy 1:17 through Deuteronomy 2:11.
In our second experiment we explore the idea that Iran is the enemy of Israel. In Chronicles II,
20:29 the verse speaks of the enemies of Israel using the plural construct phrase אויבי
ישראל
A dread of God came upon all the kingdoms of the lands when they heard that Hashem was doing battle with the enemies of Israel.
(Chronicles II 20:10)
As Iran is only one of these kingdoms, the corresponding singular construct form,
appropriate for Iran, is אויב
ישראל, or with the implied preposition
אויב לישראל
which are the phrases we use.
There is another term related to the phrase
enemy of Israel, based on the root
צרר. It is variously translated depending on interpretation as
oppress, harass, be hostile, hate, treat as an enemy, or treat as a deadly foe.
The context in which this root is used in a Torah verse is when
God speaks to Moses after the Phinehas - Cozbi affair saying,
Oppress (צרור) the Midianites
and kill them, for they oppressed you when they deceived
you in the affair of Peor and in the affair of Cozbi, daughter of a leader of Midian. (Numbers 25:17)
In Nachmanides' commentary,
צרור
is translated as
Harass. In the Hirsch commentary, it is translated
as
Oppress. Hirsch indicates that
צרור
literally means to press together, to oppress, to limit
someone's strength. The Isaiah and Sharfman translation of Rashi's commentary translate
צרור as
Harass. Rashi comments that its
grammatical form (the absolute infinitive) denotes the present tense, meaning it is incumbent (an obligation)
to keep harassing, continually. The Miller translation in the Gutnick edition of Rashi's commentary,
uses the translation
Be hostile. The Milevsky commentary translates
צרור by
Hate.
Perhaps we might think that the weakest translation of
צרור is Harass.
But it is easily seen that this translation
cannot be taken literally as used in today's English.
In ordinary modern English usage to harass is one thing, typically to
continually vex, trouble, or annoy. To kill is another. And indeed, the first (and oldest) meaning of harass
as given in the Merriam-Webster unabridged dictionary is to lay waste an enemy's country.
This usage, which is quite consistent with the Torah verse, is certainly not today's common usage.
That is why we prefer translating the biblical directive
צרור
by Oppress in the sense of limiting their strength and treating them as a deadly foe,
for an enemy that one kills is not an ordinary enemy, but a deadly foe.
There is another possible meaning for a phrase such as
צרור
ישראל. It can also mean
Oppressor of Israel.
Supporting the understanding of צרור
as oppress and treat as a deadly foe,
there is the phrase in the Megilat Esther which speaks of Haman as
צורר היהודים,
or with the vav cholem taken care of by the vowel points,
צרר היהודים,
an enemy of the Jews, a deadly foe of the Jews. (see Megilat Esther 8:1, 9:10).
This motivates us to use the phrase,
צורר היהודים,
or
צרר היהודים,
as one of our possible key word phrases in our second experiment.
The second experiment possibilities are determined from the table below. As indicated, in each category,
either exactly one or at most one key word or key word phrase is chosen. The smallest number
of key words that we allow for in any combination is four. Also note that the key word
צרור is a transitive verb and for grammatical correctness
must be followed by the direct object indicator את.
We follow our usual practice and do not look for את either
as a two letter ELS or as part of an ELS phrase where it can be a suffix on the verb or a prefix on
the object of the verb.
This is the table showing the combination of key words that can form the key word sets of our
second experiment. The key word phrases פרסאןאטומי,
איראןאטומי,
אירןאטומי,
and פרסאטמי do not occur in the Torah as ELSs.
The search produced a cylinder size of 88. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 4.5/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 46:29 through Genesis 47:19.
The search produced a cylinder size of 171. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 10.5/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 46:29 through Genesis 49:2.
The next table is perhaps interesting because there appears directly in the text of the table,
in Genesis 42:35,
צרור and
צרר. These are of course from the same
root as the corresponding terms we use as key words for Oppress, Harass and
Deadly Foe, respectively. But in the verse the root has the meaning of bundle.
The verse of Genesis 42:35 translated into English is
Then, as they were emptying their sacks, behold! -- every man's
bundle, צרור,
of money was in his sack. When they and their father saw their
bundles, צררות
of money they were terrified.
The association between this verse and the following table and other similar tables that we
show are perhaps prophetic. What is a bundle? A bundle is a group of items tied or wrapped together
for the convenience of handling or moving them.
Existentially, the bundle limits the freedom of movement of the items tied together in the bundle.
It is this fundamental idea of limitation inherrent in the root צרר
that has given rise to its secondary meaning relating to enemy, for your enemy is one who attempts
to limit your existence, strength, and freedom. It is related to oppressing or harassing
because this is one of the ways in which the enemy operates to limit your existence, strength, and freedom.
The following table and others similar to it, not only are telling us that Iran, and Iran with
its atom bomb, is an enemy and
deadly foe of Israel, that Iran is a country who wishes to oppress and harass the Jews,
but that as well Iran is a country who
is exporting their evil, abominal, and cancerous politics by giving propaganda directives to others to oppress and harass Israel
and the Jews. One can view the actions of Iran as a bundle whose end purpose is to eventually
make war on Israel, and to terrify and annihilate her Jewish population.
The search produced a cylinder size of 4930. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 13.5/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 1:14 through Exodus 33:20.
The search produced a cylinder size of 4930. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 16.5/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 1:14 through Exodus 33:20.
The search produced a cylinder size of 4930. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 19/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 1:14 through Exodus 33:20.
The search produced a cylinder size of 88. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 22/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 46:29 through Genesis 47:19.
The search produced a cylinder size of 22. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 25/10,000.
The table spans from Leviticus 19:36 through Leviticus 20:3.
The search produced a cylinder size of 171. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 27.5/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 46:29 through Genesis 48:11.
The search produced a cylinder size of 4930. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 31.5/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 1:14 through Exodus 33:19.
The search produced a cylinder size of 171. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 90/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 47:9 through Genesis 49:2.
The search produced a cylinder size of 109. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 116.5/10,000.
The table spans from Numbers 35:34 through Deuteronomy 1:1.
The search produced a cylinder size of 87. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 125/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 47:4 through Genesis 48:13.
The search produced a cylinder size of 16,113. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 225/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 41:15 through Deuteronomy 23:18.
The search produced a cylinder size of 57. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 255/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 46:30 through Genesis 47:19.
After setting up and doing the above experiment, we realized that there is another term
that might be relevant and make sense: Nuclear. So we set up another experiment whose
possibility table is below.
This is the table showing the combination of key words that can form the key word sets of our
third experiment. The key word phrases איראןגרעינית,
אירןגרעינית
and פרסגרעינית
do not occur in the Torah as ELSs.
The search produced a cylinder size of 35,254. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 130.5/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 27:1 through Deuteronomy 13:10.
The search produced a cylinder size of 35,254. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement
text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 178.5/10,000.
The table spans from Genesis 27:1 through Deuteronomy 13:10.
Iran wants its brand of Islam to dominate the world and it is on this concept that we base
our fourth experiment.