Mayan Calendar Torah Code Experiments

Maximum Row Skip = 10 Maximum Column Skip = 10

What

what
The search produced a cylinder size of 3. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 825.5/1,000.

Where

where
The search produced a cylinder size of 21,378. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 147/1,000.

When_Start

when_start
The search produced a cylinder size of 2,117 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 462/10,000.

When_End

when_end
The search produced a cylinder size of 267 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 336.5/10,000.

Who

who
The search produced a cylinder size of 12 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 591/10,000.

Where When_Start

where_when_start
The search produced a cylinder size of 326 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 223.5/10,000.

Where When_End

where_when_end
The search produced a cylinder size of 100 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 171.5/10,000.

When_Start When_End

when start when end
The search produced a cylinder size of 133. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 70.5/10,000.
when start when end
The search produced a cylinder size of 133. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 103/10,000.

Where Who

where who
The search produced a cylinder size of 707 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 499/10,000.

When_Start Who

when start who
The search produced a cylinder size of 2117. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 62.5/10,000.
when start who
The search produced a cylinder size of 18,395 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 85/10,000.

When_End Who

when end who
The search produced a cylinder size of 267 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 308.5/10,000.

Where When_Start When_End

where when start when end
The search produced a cylinder size of 56 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 24/10,000.
where when start when end
The search produced a cylinder size of 392 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 58.5/10,000.
where when start when end
The search produced a cylinder size of 100 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 61/10,000.
where when start when end
The search produced a cylinder size of 379 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 115.5/10,000.
where when start when end
The search produced a cylinder size of 40 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 123.5/10,000.
where when start when end
The search produced a cylinder size of 56 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 199.5/10,000.

Where When_Start Who

where when start who
The search produced a cylinder size of 1058 columns. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 103/10,000.
where when start who
The search produced a cylinder size of 647. With expected number of ELSs set to 50, the probability that a text from the ELS random placement text population would have as compact a table as that produced by the Torah text is 133.5/10,000.
<< Previous >> << Next >>